1997-05-14 - Re: RSA, PGP IN LEGAL FLAP OVER ENCRYPTION TECHNOLOGY

Header Data

From: jimbell@pacifier.com (Jim Bell)
To: Kent Crispin <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 4a12edb5c36d96d409b54c20d92f51cc20c3d015e68ffd8c110656c8c9bb9a11
Message ID: <199705140347.UAA24759@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-14 04:19:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 12:19:34 +0800

Raw message

From: jimbell@pacifier.com (Jim Bell)
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 12:19:34 +0800
To: Kent Crispin <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: RSA, PGP IN LEGAL FLAP OVER ENCRYPTION TECHNOLOGY
Message-ID: <199705140347.UAA24759@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 19:47 5/13/97 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 1997 at 07:11:48PM -0800, Jim Bell wrote:
>> However, I've been waiting many years for some patent-law-knowledgeable
>> person to explain why mathematics, which was widely seen as being absolutely
>> unpatentable prior to the invention of public-key cryptography, suddenly
>> became patentable just in time for RSA, etc.  
>> 
>> Until I hear such an explanation, I _DO_ begrudge RSA and others that
"right."
>
>Wow!  I agree with you!

Sit down until the feeling goes away.


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread