1997-05-13 - Re: [STEGO] Secure envelopes

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: The Spectre <spectre@nac.net>
Message Hash: e7bdc7dff39392510837a3d6593ee7857a65a04b9a0b3b529b4360f1db402642
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970513144312.971A-100000@purple.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <18052959500386@nac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-13 20:01:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 04:01:51 +0800

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 04:01:51 +0800
To: The Spectre <spectre@nac.net>
Subject: Re: [STEGO] Secure envelopes
In-Reply-To: <18052959500386@nac.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970513144312.971A-100000@purple.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 13 May 1997, The Spectre wrote:

> In response to this childish, no.cajones.com message, I have removed all
> previous filters and added one, simpler filter on incoming mail.  Delete
> when recieved from nobody@huge.cajones.com or lucifer@dhp.com.
> 
> I suggest you all to the same.. it may actually serve to make this list
> worthwhile...

I suggest that nobody do this, as this will filter out anonymous mail
from these remailers.  You do, of course, have the right to filter out
whomever you want, but there are worthwhile anonymous contributions
from these remailers.  I personally don't see what the big deal is
with these ascii-art messages.  95% of the time, these messages are
very easy to spot, and the remaining 5%, it takes two seconds to hit
the "delete" key.



Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBM3i4hCzIPc7jvyFpAQEeRQgAjC1em8iGn/wrCVW8ZVLMWuKpyXrZRqhX
uEsfghl8zloTbbkQeL/B91UB2VOpwbHTuWj/5KzEFGjqfFPqEnh3ACmTuj1bivIa
5o27zfo2FxHyf5fJRid3EeAw1oMgu5Yw1tza8HGHu1LjuxVI5bbqXibolVIr7h3u
cF3nxlBiP3yCd6kX+55jAIJCUKjOuxegXg2BF5hTir8C3DwRw7yNrl5xwIq2BNUE
5g1L2ZSY4UVEYy7K8TCwlJScne7R6rItzAyFBnGZj738iwPOVV9ok3cu+2Irq4rf
R9oTbOby47NdzFqVjyP6YR58xwHbj6gydH43npgW3kuDibtR4GEr5w==
=Mo8/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread