1997-06-17 - Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question

Header Data

From: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
To: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
Message Hash: 1b29d5857f6000e323ec7f327cd04c5ee49a6056cd47680cc4c5477871df8b9b
Message ID: <199706170746.CAA31615@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970617010815.5659A-100000@ece>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-17 07:53:06 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:53:06 +0800

Raw message

From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:53:06 +0800
To: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
Subject: Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970617010815.5659A-100000@ece>
Message-ID: <199706170746.CAA31615@mailhub.amaranth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <Pine.GSO.3.95.970617010815.5659A-100000@ece>, on 06/17/97 
   at 12:14 AM, Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu> said:

>On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:

>> If I went and rented a truck and there was a "roach" in the ashtray I
>> should not be held accountable for possesion unless it could be proved
>> that it was mine and not from someone else that had used the truck or even
>> a worker at the retal shop.

>But if you drive for several miles, and get pulled over for speeding, the
>fact that it's still in the truck is probably going to land you in jail,
>if the cop finds some reason to search the truck.  (The smell of
>marijuana or seeing the roach sitting the ashtray are valid reasons I
>believe)

>If you haven't disposed of it, you're probably going to land in jail.
>>From the law enforcement's point of view, can you see any difference
>between your story and that of a person who's actually smoking?  (Honest
>officer, it was in the truck when I got in!)  the evidence is there, and
>you'll probably need to depend on character witnesses to get out of a
>conviction...

Well usually when someone gets nailed on somthing like this its in their
own vehicle. I would think that with it being a rental that one would have
plausible deniability and additional evidence would be required.

Ofcource if when you roll down the window a big cloud of some rolls out
(ala cheech & chong) that's another matter. :)

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                        
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBM6ZBdI9Co1n+aLhhAQFloQQAogLfwKfeHP71rLxlRpz1pL09cyZXNZ5y
5S7k776XTvr5Iryt7NvO84uRI3qnjtbvuctoD+lANhZeKG4Cuj4KMUoioCqotRg/
5jeVC89CTnnorB07uDRGhVYCmlBoTBO3mDO3t4QkU60zdRdMcF6ydfppP0koys8w
xKjV562B6Dk=
=4zjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread