1997-06-07 - Re: TV Commercial

Header Data

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 7b96f0c3e0fe419df883cf8ca4f5f8d551f0a846b57892f0a5821ec2b23ef1c7
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970607152747.3758B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <v03007844afbde7341de8@[207.94.249.152]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-07 20:52:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 04:52:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 04:52:08 +0800
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: TV Commercial
In-Reply-To: <v03007844afbde7341de8@[207.94.249.152]>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970607152747.3758B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Bill Frantz wrote:

> At 12:34 AM -0700 6/6/97, David Lucas wrote:
> >It's a nice thought, but the image is all wrong. Two ships communicating
> >via Aldis lamps (presumably, I haven't seen the ad) using Morse at a guess,
> >isn't what I would call very secure communication.
> 
> Well, the Japanese managed to keep secure communications when sneeking up
> on Pearl Harbor, and I assume they used something similar for ship-to-ship
> communications.  Narrow beam, and everyone who can receive is in sight is
> nice.
> 

Did they? This is a matter of some debate ...

-r.w.






Thread