1997-06-17 - Kerrey bill introduced in Senate

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 95f617b663e2fbf8392e3e9e5a337a227b0e38fc2c6d5ad91325ace0a5b0f78d
Message ID: <v03020920afccc9833852@[139.167.130.246]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-17 23:25:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 07:25:50 +0800

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 07:25:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Kerrey bill introduced in Senate
Message-ID: <v03020920afccc9833852@[139.167.130.246]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




--- begin forwarded text


X-Sender: gbroiles@mail.io.com (Unverified)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:41:46 -0700
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Kerrey bill introduced in Senate
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
X-Loop: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net


Sen. Kerrey's evil "Secure Public Networks Act" was introduced in the
Senate today, cosponsored by Sen. McCain.

The bill, if passed, would:

Criminalize the knowing use of crypto to encrypt data or communications in
furtherance of a crime; (s. 104)

Criminalize breaking another person's ciphertext for the purpose of
violating their privacy, security, or property rights; (goodbye, Netscape
bugs bounty and DES/RC4 cracks) (s. 105(3))

Criminalize intercepting another's intellectual property for the purpose of
violating intellectual property rights (s. 105(4))

Criminalize issuing a key to another person in furtherance of a crime (s.
105(6))

Require federal government purchasers of crypto equipment to buy GAK
crypto; (s. 202, 204)

Require crypto products purchased with federal funds for use on a public
network to employ GAK crypto; (s. 203, 205)

Legalize the export of 56-bit DES crypto; (s. 302)

Criminalizes the issuance of signature certificates by registered CA's for
encryption keys if the user has not complied with GAK procedures; (s.
407(a)(4))

Criminalizes requesting a signature certificate for an encryption key from
a registered CA if the user has not complied with GAK procedures; (s.
407(a)(5))

Allows the Secretary of Commerce to "make investigations, obtain
information, take sworn testimony, and require reports or the keeping of
records by .. any person", to the extent necessary to enforce the Act; (s.
701(a))

Allows the Secretary of Commerce to subpoena witnesses and documents in any
State at any designated place; (s. 701(b)(3)(A))

Allows the Secretary of Commerce to impose civil/adminstrative penalties of
up to $100K for violations of the Act; (s. 702(1))


Ugh. The original is online at
<http://www.senate.gov/~kerrey/encrypt/encrypt2.html>, mirrored at
<http://www.parrhesia.com/kerrey.html>.




--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com         |
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.

--- end forwarded text



-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/







Thread