1997-06-10 - Re: Question about anonymizing proxies

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 9c69050d4fba7325526c4f0339d29158e84d18678a7077f2ffe55599af83a4ed
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970610012038.03060dfc@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199706091758.KAA31403@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-10 08:29:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 16:29:53 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 16:29:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Question about anonymizing proxies
In-Reply-To: <199706091758.KAA31403@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970610012038.03060dfc@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 10:58 AM 6/9/97 -0700, Huge Cajones Remailer forwarded:
>Sorry if this has been beaten to death before (if it has, a pointer to
>where it is in the archives would be appreciated), but is it possible to
>chain anonymizing proxy servers in a way similar to remailers?

Depends on the user interfaces of the anonymizing proxies - 
a system that lets you request what you want in the URL
may let you do more than a system that insists you type stuff in blanks,
but on the other hand,
http://anon.foo.com/proxy/anon.bar.com/proxy/anon.zork.com/proxy/thoughtcrim
e.com/
lets the everything in the chain see that you're really trying to reach
thoughtcrime.com, while a succession of SSL-encrypted forms popping up that
you fill in the blanks on may be harder to automate, but more secure.

#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
#   (If this is a mailing list or news, please Cc: me on replies.  Thanks.)






Thread