1997-06-14 - Re: Wired News’ War Correspondent on kiddie porn

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <llurch+spamfilter@stanford.edu>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 9eed1b4a7878394f80ce914230914bcb3c7d65f164dc16f354065f3d5421ce89
Message ID: <aglhlaghjklahlase@quixote.stanford.edu>
Reply To: <5nggqs%24jjf@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-14 05:46:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 13:46:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <llurch+spamfilter@stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 13:46:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Wired News' War Correspondent on kiddie porn
In-Reply-To: <5nggqs%24jjf@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <aglhlaghjklahlase@quixote.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> http://www.wired.com/news/culture/story/4437.html
>
>   Hacker Vows 'Terror' for Child Pornographers
>   by Steve Silberman
[...]
>   "Basically, we're talking about a Dirty Harry attitude," one network
>   technician/cypherpunk told Wired News. Though he senses "real feeling"
>   behind Se7en's battle cry, he feels that the best way to deal with
>   pornographers is to "turn the police loose on them."

Grr. Didn't notice that on first reading. Of course I meant evidence of
criminal child abuse that Mike Godwin considers illegal, not "pornography."
Since he snipped my name on request, though, I suppose I can't really
complain.

-rich
 http://www.stanford.edu/~llurch/






Thread