1997-06-19 - Re: Crypto-compromises in Washington: Burns offers ProCODE II

Header Data

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d64afe70f7a8e6cdaafac3c67302d6d2220bedd6caebf659b89ae19048407752
Message ID: <199706191514.IAA03521@fat.doobie.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-19 15:30:15 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 23:30:15 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 23:30:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Crypto-compromises in Washington: Burns offers ProCODE II
Message-ID: <199706191514.IAA03521@fat.doobie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh wrote:
> 
> Rocke Verser's announcement couldn't have come at a
> more embarrassing time for the White House. At 3:46 pm
> yesterday, after five months of painstaking work, the
> Colorado computer consultant fired off an excited
> message to the DES challenge mailing list: "WE FOUND IT!"

  After the DES challenge began, didn't someone on the cypherpunks list
predict that the key would be cracked at a time that was opportune for
RSA, et al, and that the key would be found by "c2Nut testicles?"

 I can't find my printout of the post but if my memory serves me
correctly then (s)he predicted more than a few of the events surrounding
the DES challenge.
  The timing of the find is certainly opportune and there is no doubt
that the company that found the key is closely connected to c2net (not
to mention the spooks the company fronts for in Costa Rica and South
America). Also, the Genx effort was plagued with internal and external
sabotage, as predicted, and several other efforts were chilled before 
they ever got off the ground (by government and corporate legal
consultants who all seem to have close connections to Colorado DoD
agencies).

  I am not suggesting that RSA and their cohorts would put the fix in
just because their is a tremendous amount of money and power surrounding
this issue (both corporate and political) but I have certainly noticed
that there doesn't seem to be any area of the crypto community where I
don't find the same dark figures flitting through the shadows (and they
all seem to have agendas linked to secret government labs and unelected
government regulatory comittees).
  I was a bit skeptical of some of the rather paranoid claims I saw on
the cypherpunks list at times but I can certainly vouch for the fact
that there were more than a few computer admins in the New York area
who were told from on high that using their company's computers in
the DES challenge would not bode well for future government contracts.
  I am beginning to wonder if I shouldn't have majored in nuclear
physics since there seems to be less political intrigue in that arena
than in the crypto arena these days.

Chauncey Gardner






Thread