1997-06-17 - Re: PGP for Windows 95

Header Data

From: Arunas Norvaisa <arunas@post1.com>
To: “Silvakow” <ea2onov@atlas.moa.net>
Message Hash: d96b1e86211f1b1e54c5a4a756c813c0839144f4b17ef86456373546b3ec0f29
Message ID: <3.0.32.19970617171734.00688900@post1.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-17 14:30:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 22:30:59 +0800

Raw message

From: Arunas Norvaisa <arunas@post1.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 22:30:59 +0800
To: "Silvakow" <ea2onov@atlas.moa.net>
Subject: Re: PGP for Windows 95
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970617171734.00688900@post1.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 08:55 AM 97.06.17 +0000, Silvakow wrote (and I quoted):
>
>Has anyone yet checked out PGP for Windows 95?  It's $50 at stores 
>right now.  Information from pgp.com, but I want to know more before 
>I buy it.  Is it worth it?  Should I stick with PGP for DOS?  And 
>does anyone know if those PGP public keys are compatible with DOS 
>PGP?

 What d'ya mean??? PGP 5.0 is much more (not USD 50 in any case);
freeware PGP (latest version 2.6.2 for USA and 2.6.3i outside US)
is working just fine in MS-Dos shell under windoze'95... If you
mean specific shell (what I doubt), it's not PGP itself and you'll
still will get those dos windows anyway...


--
greetz... Arunas Norvaisa - little guy, The Masses Inc.
<mailto:arunas@post1.com> with subject: 'send key' to get PGP key
PGP for idiots page <http://www.a-vip.com/an>
  and a mirror site <http://www.post1.com/~arunas>
Programming Department:  Mistakes made while you wait.






Thread