1997-06-27 - Re: Top ATM maker signs deal with eye-scanning technology firm

Header Data

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: f3e900c46a6768147c59e05169c5194251818a7bb48327b29ac9ed44d531fd23
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970626142951.381D-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <199706251336.GAA26072@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-27 00:06:25 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:06:25 +0800

Raw message

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 08:06:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Top ATM maker signs deal with eye-scanning technology firm
In-Reply-To: <199706251336.GAA26072@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970626142951.381D-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




>    TRENTON, N.J. (June 24, 1997 9:38 p.m. EDT) -- NCR Corp., the world's
>    top maker of automated teller machines, plans to start offering
>    machines that identify the user by scanning the eye.

This is not a good idea for ATMs, I have said this many times before: 

At present unauthorised use of someones account involves stealing their 
ATM card and PIN, which is insured against if reported soon anyway. If 
biometric ID becomes commonplace theivery of this kind involves either:

1. Gouging out someones eyeball (would this actually work or would the 
damage done to the eye render it useless?)

Or, more likely:

2. Kidnapping the account holder and forcing them to ID themselves at 
gunpoint/knifepoint.


I would sure as hell rather have the inconvenience of going home and 
calling the CC company to report a stolen card, than be kidnapped and 
possible harmed for a few $.

        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"






Thread