1997-07-01 - Re: NRA and National Online Records Check bullshit

Header Data

From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 6133e256b49cfb0df47fc70de7aa0a03aa42340ed420ba9f08b2b89b1fac491a
Message ID: <19970701175103.2307.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-01 19:33:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 03:33:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 03:33:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: NRA and National Online Records Check bullshit
Message-ID: <19970701175103.2307.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Citizen-Unit T.C. May wrote:
>(Somehow most people think it's OK that convicted felons lose their rights
>to vote and to have guns. (Once they're released, of course.) Do they think
>convicted felons no longer have religious freedom? Can no longer write as
>they wish? Jeesh.)

  Citizen-Unit May is coming dangerously close to thought-crime in this
message. The politically correct phrasing is as follows: 

  "Since convicted felons lose their rights to vote and to have guns, surely 
there is no reason why they shouldn't also lose their rights to free speech 
and religious freedom. We must protect the children from such dangers."

  This issue provides clear support for our long tradition of compromising
with the government on important issues - had we taken a "no compromise"
stand on felon's rights to vote and own guns then we would not now be able
to use that as justification for restricting further rights, just as prior
compromise on the First Amendment rights of "child pornographers" has given 
the government a neccesary stepping-stone for restricting freedom of speech 
of adult pornographers and other authorized enemies.

CompromiseMonger






Thread