cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-07-15 - Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal

Header Data

From: Unprivileged user <nobody@www.video-collage.com>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 78d8f77e0673f0e9ef9e83d729212255c0712c76478abf41a6dc841ef415abe2
Message ID: <97Jul15.173517edt.32258@brickwall.ceddec.com>
Reply To: <19970715115457.07611@bywater.songbird.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-15 21:44:01 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 05:44:01 +0800

Raw message

From: Unprivileged user <nobody@www.video-collage.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 05:44:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
In-Reply-To: <19970715115457.07611@bywater.songbird.com>
Message-ID: <97Jul15.173517edt.32258@brickwall.ceddec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 1997 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Unprivileged user wrote:
> > But to return to the cypher aspect, what about altering existing images so
> > that they are unidentifiable as to whether they are from real acts or
> > truly the products of an imagination.  Will we now need someone from the
> > government to certify the kiddie porn isn't real?
> 
> Yes, that's the logical next step -- Government Approved Porn (GAP).  
> Perhaps we could get Senator Hatch to sponsor a bill?
> 
> The constitutional implications are staggering.

Actually, Government Approved Kiddieporn, or GAK.  Isn't Hatch already for
GAK?

--- reply to tzeruch - at - ceddec - dot - com ---

Thread