1997-07-18 - Re: Brookings Inst. on crypto: “There are reasonable compromises”

Header Data

From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net (Cypherpunks List)
Message Hash: 82dd40305afc7da707b07d52baa4748bdc62485591c34ead51e81a6c1e13089a
Message ID: <199707181959.PAA27626@jafar.issl.atl.hp.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718092025.13136L-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-18 19:48:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 03:48:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 03:48:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net (Cypherpunks List)
Subject: Re: Brookings Inst. on crypto: "There are reasonable compromises"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718092025.13136L-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <199707181959.PAA27626@jafar.issl.atl.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh forwards:

[ "There are reasonable compromises" ]

> no. 21
> Deciphering the Cryptography Debate
> 
> July 1997
> By Kenneth Flamm

In what way is this a compromise?  This is just the standard LEA
position.  Oh, I see.  Those who disagree with this position are the
ones expected to "compromise".

There's no room for compromise anyway.  They want access to our keys,
we don't want them to have access.  Either they succeed or we do.
There's no middle ground.


-- Jeff






Thread