1997-07-31 - Re: Entrust Technologies’s Solo - free download

Header Data

From: “Dr. Jai Maharaj” <jai@mantra.com>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: 832674460165218fb1c23502bb0405916ff46316275daacadcb83510b53d0e6b
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970731084010.009d8100@caprica.com>
Reply To: <199707311521.LAA03989@mail.storm.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-31 18:51:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 02:51:38 +0800

Raw message

From: "Dr. Jai Maharaj" <jai@mantra.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 02:51:38 +0800
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Entrust Technologies's Solo - free download
In-Reply-To: <199707311521.LAA03989@mail.storm.ca>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970731084010.009d8100@caprica.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:21 AM 7/31/97 -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> Dr. Jai Maharaj <jai@mantra.com> writes:
>
>|> ...where on this scale do you start to object to my actions:
>|> 1) I use a killfile to ignore certain messages.
>|> 2) I program my personal newsserver to discard certain messages.
>|> 3) A group of us, by consensus, program our common newsserver...
>|
>|Unanimous consent?
>|
>|> 4) A system admin, with due notice to users, programs a 
>|> newserver.....
>|
>|What constitutes "due notice" in the present context?
>
>Postings in news.announce.newusers.

That's ridiculous.  One shopping for an ISP, without
access to the Net, is not in a position to read a
notice in a newsgroup.  It makes sense that censorship
and forgery advocates would also suggest means of hiding
the truth.

Again, if an ISP were to advertise "Newsgroups censored 
through forgery" -- in electronic, print and broadcast
media, or wherever advertisements are placed or material
made available to investors, then that would be "due notice".

Jai Maharaj
jai@mantra.com
Om Shanti







Thread