1997-07-28 - Re: NSA leak (fwd)

Header Data

From: Harry Tuttle Remailer <h_tuttle@rigel.cyberpass.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f7844720a3bc3352a7706a0fd1b392b70386afe587d5510479e833f9b0902b59
Message ID: <199707280920.CAA07789@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Reply To: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-28 09:33:16 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:33:16 +0800

Raw message

From: Harry Tuttle Remailer <h_tuttle@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:33:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <19970727234600.3398.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
Message-ID: <199707280920.CAA07789@rigel.cyberpass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sun, Jul 27, 1997 at 11:46:00PM -0000, Secret Squirrel wrote:
> Subject: Re: NSA leak (fwd)
> 
> Ian Goldberg <iang@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
> > 2. Their cracker changes the state of 2^128 bits in 33 minutes.  This is
> >    being extremely generous;
> 
> >                          (Actually, for all I know, terawatt power sources
> >    may exist; that's out of my field.  Please let me know if this is the case.
> 
> 
> Not within a few million miles of here, and they'd be hard to conceal.
> 
> A few GW is fairly easy, by several methods.

Terawatts for a few microseconds is fairly standard technology, I 
believe.  Femtosecond laser pulses driven by *very* large capacitor 
banks... 

> Terrestrial fusion is not a serious contender yet, and I doubt
> it will be for a long time.

It's easy to generate lots of power through fusion.  The problem is 
confinement. 






Thread