1997-07-16 - The Big Sellout

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f9c77bbe4438239f51d28603934123c44f556f0c86ac210d24c96bca2daf3651
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970715221302.15222E-100000@well.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-16 05:57:30 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 13:57:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 13:57:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: The Big Sellout
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970715221302.15222E-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 22:35:21 -0400
From: Michael Sims <jellicle@inch.com>
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Cc: jberman@cdt.org, jseiger@cdt.org
Subject: The Big Sellout

So CDT, a few questions:

1)  "The Center for Democracy and Technology, meanwhile, is
supposed to debut a Web page that would give parents information on
how and where to get free smut-screening software, Berman said."

Did ya really?  Smut-screening software?

2)  Do you feel that mandatory voluntary net ratings are an 
improvement over the CDA?  If so, why?

3)  Does the statement by the National PTA, a censorious group if
ever there was one, that they favor "voluntary" action give you any
pause?  That is, if your two organizations are on the same side
here, do you ever wonder if these actions are achieving your goals
or theirs?



-- Michael Sims








Thread