1997-08-22 - Re: Spam-killing PGP5/ecash postage plugin Was Re: Remailer chaining plugin for Eudora

Header Data

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1e67903482ae05a679c3c210c4d3d8317c8c0313705d0aca80ca829fca6cda7e
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970822090126.009e1390@localhost>
Reply To: <v0311070cb02275a79bcd@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-22 07:22:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 15:22:32 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 15:22:32 +0800
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Spam-killing PGP5/ecash postage plugin Was Re: Remailer   chaining  plugin for Eudora
In-Reply-To: <v0311070cb02275a79bcd@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970822090126.009e1390@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Hettinga wrote:
>> and it would be the death of mailing lists.
>Not at all. At the very least, mail from lists I'm subcribed to could
come
>postage due.

But then you'll get spam on the list. Most of the spam I get is from
mailing lists.

If it's $.02 to send a mail to 10000 cypherpunks, then spammers won't
hesitate to send it. If it's $.02 * 10000 ($200) then only rich people
(like tcmay) will post here. The only solution I see is moderation and
censorship, and that can be (and has been) done without e-postage.

Exactly how do you think that e-postage would decrease spam on mailing
lists?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBM/1HLMUc8bdD9cnfEQK+mACfaKBL1UHz54rTIVG1OLf3ASQ330IAn3QR
Ped/qRtSae20p/vDrMCzCCQj
=Bp6T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mike.






Thread