1997-08-08 - Re: Query on cookies

Header Data

From: “Paul H. Merrill” <paulmerrill@acm.org>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: 683d01b42c15e486a78c2d03d279cfb89bbea9846248e95e2a8a6b6aee9ac35d
Message ID: <33EB8DA7.71C8@acm.org>
Reply To: <wkk5ae1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 18:49:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 02:49:42 +0800

Raw message

From: "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 02:49:42 +0800
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Query on cookies
In-Reply-To: <wkk5ae1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <33EB8DA7.71C8@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> 
> "Paul H. Merrill" <paulmerrill@acm.org> writes:
> 
> > Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > >
> > > Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > I believe this is what the folks at Netscape tried to eliminate in 4.0,
> > > > which I'm told features four cookie settings. One rejects "third party
> > > > cookies."
> > >
> > > Blessed are those who believe.
> > >
> > And for those who don't believe there is always Read Only for
> > Cookies.txt.
> 
> This won't save cookies to disk, but won't they be around for the duration
> of one session?
> 
True, true, but the belief level needed is low and the hysterical data
aspects are gone even if you are still tracking mud around from the
"current" walkabout.

PHM






Thread