1997-08-21 - Re: An end to “court appointed attorneys”

Header Data

From: nobody@neva.org (Neva Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 71c37a0f8ab8e03c85e752f241becb6c3cfeab9a1c62a8b01cb6f0dc27379b99
Message ID: <199708210406.VAA11265@mail-gw.pacbell.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-21 04:20:43 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:20:43 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@neva.org (Neva Remailer)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:20:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
Message-ID: <199708210406.VAA11265@mail-gw.pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




frissell@panix.com wrote:

> Jury nullification and aggressive attacks on the judge and the prosecutor are
> just a few of the defense strategies that a lawyer won't indulge in but a
> client proceeding in pro per is free to use.
> 
> DCF
> 
> "I respectfully request that your Honor recuse yourself because you have a
> financial interest in the outcome of these proceedings.  Your salary is paid
> from tax monies and if my arguments on the tax system are accepted, your
> income will be cut off.  I request appointment of a judge who does not
> receive payment from taxation."

Things Judges Love To Hear #328:
  "If you're going to be deciding my fate, would you mind peeing into
this cup for me? Nothing personal, you understand."

PissMonger








Thread