1997-08-08 - Re: forged cancels (Re: Entrust Technologies’s Solo - free

Header Data

From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a04f52e8542e5ecc0a7af68b8b39321035ac9542654e8629600fd1b19b817c4b
Message ID: <19970808003832.21296@bywater.songbird.com>
Reply To: <19970807173814.48963@bywater.songbird.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 07:44:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 00:44:30 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 00:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: forged cancels (Re: Entrust Technologies's Solo - free
In-Reply-To: <19970807173814.48963@bywater.songbird.com>
Message-ID: <19970808003832.21296@bywater.songbird.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, Aug 07, 1997 at 10:00:25PM -0500, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 1997 at 12:53:16PM -0700, Ross Wright wrote:
> > [...]
> > >
> > > For no reason whatsoever should you cancel a message you did not send
> > > yourself.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> > How about if it is an employee of yours, using your computer
> > equipment, that sent the message, in explict contradition to your
> > companies stated policy?
> 
> Use a retraction server (David's project)

Just curious -- how would this be morally different from doing a
cancel?

[...]

> kent Crispin sounds like a pedophile.

You need to get your hearing checked, then.

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com			the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44  61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html





Thread