1997-08-23 - Re: Inside the Cypherpunks Cult (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: f41cb851459278cffb800b068ced132b74c66d5060325d6fc75b533cb2443e6d
Message ID: <199708232024.PAA26124@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-23 20:24:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:24:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:24:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Inside the Cypherpunks Cult (fwd)
Message-ID: <199708232024.PAA26124@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Subject: Re: Inside the Cypherpunks Cult (fwd)
> From: Firebeard <stend+cypherpunks@sten.tivoli.com>
> Date: 23 Aug 1997 14:11:13 -0500

> >>>>> Jim Choate writes:
> 
> JC> And any soldier who fires on Americans is clearly going against
> JC> prima facia evidence that the framers intended for American
> JC> military force to NEVER be used against American citizens on
> JC> American soil.
> 
> 	Being a Pennsylvania native, I refer you to the 'Whiskey
> Rebellion', 1791-4, western Pennsylvania.  Mr Washington, one of those
> framers, sent American troops (militia, under federal control) against
> American citizens on American soil.

Militia <> Army.

Exactly, they were militia NOT federal troops. This is EXACTLY why we have
the militia mentioned in the 2nd. With there being no mechanism to
constitutionaly employ federal troops against Americans there had to be some
means to maintane the peace. In addition there needed to be some mechanism
to prevent the federals from mis-using those troops hence the 2-year limit
at the federal level for all monies expended on federal troops. No such
limit applies to monies given to the states to fund their individual
militias. Which are LOANED to the federal government with the consent of the
govenor of the particular states. The idea being that if the fed's mis-use
those troops the govenor simply orders them to stand down. Without voluntary
help from the states the feds should be powerless inside the borders of the
US.

I suspect that there is a certain level of misrepresentation of what went on
during the Whiskey Rebellion (which I was aware of before your elucidation).
Near as I can tell Washington acted responsibly within the bounds of the
intent and word of the Constitution.

    ____________________________________________________________________
   |                                                                    |
   |          Participation requires more than just bitching!           |
   |                                                                    | 
   |            _____                             The Armadillo Group   |
   |         ,::////;::-.                           Austin, Tx. USA     |
   |        /:'///// ``::>/|/                     http:// www.ssz.com/  |
   |      .',  ||||    `/( e\                                           |
   |  -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-                         Jim Choate       |
   |                                                 ravage@ssz.com     |
   |                                                  512-451-7087      |
   |____________________________________________________________________|






Thread