1997-08-25 - Re: $1 Million Code Crack

Header Data

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f93614fcd22fa2344acf1efbc36360a44bd9ed070a910ce190e6217e79d59541
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970825095304.00971960@localhost>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19970822143251.0072f110@pop.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-25 08:18:40 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 16:18:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 16:18:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: $1 Million Code Crack
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19970822143251.0072f110@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970825095304.00971960@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



John Young wrote:
>   Mr. Neeley admits his integrity is on the line. "If I'm
>   wrong," he notes, "we're out of business."

It looks like they're out of business already. I tried to mail their
technical support but the mail bounced. The web page
<http://www.ultimateprivacy.com/html/service.html> says that when you buy
the software you get two OTP's in the package. There is not a single word
on how to get any more OTP's, how they are created or distributed.

Since you need a unique OTP for every party you wish to communicate with,
the OTP distribution should be a major part of the product. Yet, they don't
even mention it!


Mike.






Thread