1997-09-10 - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill

Header Data

From: “Peter D. Junger” <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 0b47687467b99324862ab8e529c8116113517e4a5cb6dee21beeec5f14a7a3c1
Message ID: <199709101001.GAA02895@upaya.multiverse.com>
Reply To: <v03102807b03bc5e166cd@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-10 10:10:37 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 18:10:37 +0800

Raw message

From: "Peter D. Junger" <junger@upaya.multiverse.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 18:10:37 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill
In-Reply-To: <v03102807b03bc5e166cd@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199709101001.GAA02895@upaya.multiverse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May writes:

: The "software as free speech, which means it can be subjected to prior
: restraint, government censorship, or export control" argument is proceeding
: nicely, thanks to Bernstein, Gilmore, Junger, Cohn, and others, and is a
: much more solid basis for ensuring civil liberties.

Uhrr . . . .  I don't think that is quite the way we phrased the
argument.

--
Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
 EMAIL: junger@samsara.law.cwru.edu    URL:  http://samsara.law.cwru.edu   
     NOTE: junger@pdj2-ra.f-remote.cwru.edu no longer exists






Thread