1997-09-13 - Re: Any talk of limiting existing crypto?

Header Data

From: jf_avon@citenet.net
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 13e704db8331ce7ea795b9d7204d9b138be34f46cd094642d68d7d077b61855c
Message ID: <199709131518.LAA22217@cti06.citenet.net>
Reply To: <v03110791b03f7ebcdf09@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-13 15:21:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 23:21:44 +0800

Raw message

From: jf_avon@citenet.net
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 23:21:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Any talk of limiting _existing_ crypto?
In-Reply-To: <v03110791b03f7ebcdf09@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <199709131518.LAA22217@cti06.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This mail is brought to you by the e$pam mailing list

> From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
> Subject: Any talk of limiting _existing_ crypto?


>  Integration with mailers and browsers may not even be such a good idea, as
>  the evolution of such products will cause obsolescence.

What about add-on package to current e-mail packages that does not 
contain crypto but makes the interface between crypto programs and 
e-mail client  (pgpjn for pegasus, Private Idaho, etc) ?

Are they regulated too?
-- 
Jean-Francois Avon, Pierrefonds(Montreal) QC Canada
 DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee
    Finest of Limoges porcelain and crystal
 JFA Technologies, R&D consultants
    physicists and engineers, LabView programing.
PGP encryption keys at:
   http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
   http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html
ID# C58ADD0D  : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 
ID# 5B51964D  : 152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C






Thread