1997-09-25 - RE: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)

Header Data

From: Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>
To: “‘Lizard’” <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>
Message Hash: 1b04f0814f3f6da9a77e58a07cfa61f4f93061ff9fc118636a0e5455597fda2c
Message ID: <01BCC9C9.8B78F1E0.aweissman@mocc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 22:20:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:20:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:20:09 +0800
To: "'Lizard'" <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
Message-ID: <01BCC9C9.8B78F1E0.aweissman@mocc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Thursday, September 25, 1997 12:00 PM, Lizard [SMTP:lizard@dnai.com] 
wrote:
> But to do that, you see, you'll need warrents, reasons for
> suspiscion, and, becuase of the effort involved, you'll only do it
> for serious crimes with a strong liklihood of conviction. *That* is
> the 'stauts quo' law enforcement *claims* to want.

and the technical realities of encryption, plus the limitations of any 
"NETCenter," will force a respect for, or at least compliance with, the 4th 
amendment.  Hooray!

Aaron






Thread