1997-09-03 - Re: Big Brother is watching

Header Data

From: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
To: Nate Sammons <nate@infidels.org>
Message Hash: 2a058a86e1189eb69ac90ae9e3f839c110e8f33a14644f439a75b0e8615092b6
Message ID: <v03102803b0337a472102@[207.79.65.77]>
Reply To: <v03102800b0331277b5be@[207.79.65.77]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-03 20:21:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 04:21:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Chip Mefford <cmefford@avwashington.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 04:21:19 +0800
To: Nate Sammons <nate@infidels.org>
Subject: Re: Big Brother is watching
In-Reply-To: <v03102800b0331277b5be@[207.79.65.77]>
Message-ID: <v03102803b0337a472102@[207.79.65.77]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Nate wrote;

Snip
>  They leave a cop in the front to
>eat donuts and watch TV, and in the back there is a video camera and a radar
>gun.  On the front driver's side mirror there's another camera.  When you
>drive by too fast, you get your picture taken (front and back) and a ticket
>gets mailed to you a week later.


Now THAT is interesting,

seems in Colo, they have some idea about the bill of rights, even though
the plunger-kicker is a doughnut whore, it is still present at the scene,
rather than being an unmanned Bot.

So the plunger-kicker, hypothetically could be crossexamined in court,
unlike the Bots of the Peoples Republik of Virginia.

Isn't there a wierd clause about being able to face your accuser??? Yeah, I
know, I live in a fantasy world.

luv
chipper








Thread