1997-09-01 - No Subject

Header Data

From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer@bureau42.ml.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 33dae5bc6f078f71dbfc6c3891a6f2b103ac669f4bbad5f5031f02c738063378
Message ID: <cJ7vHp9OYe6SZxEVBEbNlQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-01 12:30:05 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 20:30:05 +0800

Raw message

From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer@bureau42.ml.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 20:30:05 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <cJ7vHp9OYe6SZxEVBEbNlQ==@bureau42.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Rabid Wombat wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> 
> > "Smak" delivered an encrypted CD containing over 100,000 stolen
> > credit card numbers. After the validity of the credit card information
> > was confirmed through decryption of the data on the CD, "Smak" was
> > taken into custody by the FBI.
> >
> >   And the 100,000 people were immediately notified that their credit
> > cards had been compromised? I fucking doubt it. Better to screw over
> > 100,000 citizen-units than expose the incompetence of a few companies
> > and the government's fight against strong encryption and computer
> > security.
> 
> I was recently notified by a bank that issued one of my credit cards that
> my card number had been sold, along with thousands of other account
> numbers, to an undercover FBI agent. The bank canceled my account, opened
> a new one, and overnighted a replacement card. No big deal, and no loss
> to me.
> 
> OTOH, it *might* have been in response to a different incident. Keep
> those paranoid rants coming.

  Why don't you tell us the name of the company that has such lousy
computer security that your credit was placed in jepoardy, so that we
can decide if we want to avoid doing business with them?

RantMonger






Thread