1997-09-11 - The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Hiawatha Bray <wathab@tiac.net>
Message Hash: 3b945c09c74466e9e7b341dae6d92f78ed5a709406a04f58862e651ef4346a67
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970911124811.12105H-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <01BCBEC8.8E34E8A0.wathab@tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-11 20:24:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 04:24:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 04:24:45 +0800
To: Hiawatha Bray <wathab@tiac.net>
Subject: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights
In-Reply-To: <01BCBEC8.8E34E8A0.wathab@tiac.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970911124811.12105H-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



The Commerce Committee got a two-week extension from the Speaker...

Now, is this good or bad news for crypto? Not sure if it's bad news, but
it's far from necessarily good news. The Eavesdrop Establishment is
swarming on Capitol Hill right now. The staff on Intelligence are
jubilant. Goodlatte may be standing firm, based on what other journalists
and his staff tells me, but other supposed friends of freedom (including
one fellow who's a guest speaker at a forthcoming Cato conference) are
talking about more crypto-in-a-crime restrictions. The Commerce Committee,
I'm told, got briefed by Freeh in a closed-door hearing yesterday evening
without staff present.

This, as I've said for months, is the problem of playing politics with our
constitutional rights.

-Declan


On Thu, 11 Sep 1997, Hiawatha Bray wrote:

> Till when, Declan?  And do you know why, perchance?







Thread