1997-09-04 - Re: Big Brother is watching

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5b8eab663ac40e3d044164b2501d23316315ee078d336d9ad185f6545b27b05c
Message ID: <199709040837.KAA23572@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-04 08:57:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 16:57:45 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 16:57:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Big Brother is watching
Message-ID: <199709040837.KAA23572@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Lucky Green wrote:
 
> I read in this morning's paper that in the wake of Diana's death, bills are
> being proposed to require licensing for the use of high powered telescopic
> lenses such as those used by celebrity photographers. Ignoring for a moment
> that such an act would make physical confrontation with said photographers
> even more likely, I note the similarity in language used to describe camera
> lenses to language used to describe certain firearms. Soon we will hear
> about the dangers of "assault lenses". The sheeple will eat it up.

  For some reason this made me think of the thread containing light-bulb
jokes, and some warped wit saying,
  "Sure, light bulb jokes are funny, until someone burns a retina..."

  Though I laughed my ass off, at the time, have things really begun to
deteriorate so rapidly that I am justified in now wondering if there
will be a "Light Bulb Joke Amendment" to the "Telescopic Lens
Registration"
legislation?

TruthMonger






Thread