1997-09-26 - Re: Remailer latencies

Header Data

From: “David E. Smith” <dave@bureau42.ml.org>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 6c7690ccd5a85fdcd2716bee5165e44fdaf2ac659d7628fb572cfdd1bde69eb9
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970926225502.9945A-100000@bureau42.ml.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-26 23:06:02 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 07:06:02 +0800

Raw message

From: "David E. Smith" <dave@bureau42.ml.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 07:06:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Remailer latencies
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970926225502.9945A-100000@bureau42.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Please excuse my reluctance to fund your dedicated line, but probably
> the money would be better spent subsidizing hardware for people who
> are willing to set up remailers.
Sadly, I have to concur with the previous comments - but I'll go one better.
Send me twenty bucks a month to cover the local phone company's charges
for a second line, and I can get latency down to under an hour.  I'll just
put in an every-15-minutes-or-so crontab to dial up, fetch my system's mail,
and process it.

> Incidentally, if somebody offered you colocation space, would you be
> willing to set up your machine there?
I wouldn't, and I hope not many other remailer operators would either.
A lot of the security on my machine comes from having physical control over
it. (That includes the ability to rapidly delete things with extreme
prejudice should the spooks come knocking at the door.) If I'm not sleeping
in the room next to my machine, I don't have that kind of control.

Also, I can't afford a second machine so I have to keep this one around for
personal use :(

dave (bureau42 remailer admin)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNCw6f66m0j5YvamrEQIN4ACfT7XirNvtvAMG9hpbtI9YclwY+3oAnjdM
xBaiL5pG+FkOGVtGfdGuDASB
=kSpE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread