1997-09-28 - Re: Remailer Attack

Header Data

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: a4e2253f51834ee220804e89d659394c274af02ac72cc32b703948c9a0239238
Message ID: <89bca20c4c4e7e17eddcd9e11f3b5f69@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-28 21:16:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:16:52 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:16:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Remailer Attack
Message-ID: <89bca20c4c4e7e17eddcd9e11f3b5f69@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Robert A. Costner wrote:
>The downtime statistic is more an indication of when email has to be
>sent more than once to get to Redneck.  Apparently this is 17 out of
>1,000 messages on the average.  To be honest, I don't really know how
>the stats program works, I'm just assuming this is what is being
>checked.

If the downtime statistic reflects connection failures it isn't that
useful.  This sort of problem is relatively common on the Net and is
handled automatically.  I strongly suspect it really does reflect
disappeared messages.

Does anybody know how Raph's stats are collected?

Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBNC6RMpaWtjSmRH/5AQEl1gf+JU8Pd3hC3J5LpEL4duLAUu9rL68XF3J2
j4f/hQx8ZzY0mDHLuQEIC5Z0S6yJzE26lydye3lZmGsA1WT2LSK7VoLKd3K1ajjD
asnK2J3NIokk2ndicgPbzITiBYyL48qJc8nxsbXV6Thzl5nP3JadNyF0QWudibp0
xxOFvmK0xnWA2BXYu8prXqZmfHE4z5i+ccGeZVP2g+EFQ/Dy04KinoMW+IQFms+M
iI7iVRKTUmPPCSIoKJ4HZpGzyCGhkaSDBeu/gKkA+AOR9P7B2ZUllE9BMhxv4OEb
zrLfbp6fwyJKv36Sob48pm0XHsDeV8mdcT9qM7MtAghryu27J+MfQA==
=cIpG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----









Thread