1997-09-25 - Re: Oxley Amendment

Header Data

From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
To: “‘cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: b3b099f43d5011fd3555a3b94010cd458bb4fd356b9b8b15963e0644dd40abbb
Message ID: <01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 03:51:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:51:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:51:51 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
Message-ID: <01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring 
up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented 
coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to 
make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream.   I 
find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction 
of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his 
constituents want....


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNCndC6kD4Ab4OebpEQJYvQCg1YyRAp1npa4euRQdhh/CKjjbY8MAnRr2
cAljqiyA7E8TNF5wvdKwVBXz
=bsvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread