From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 04:24:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <ccbc9adab2fcbebd2a5e59e54cb287dc@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Steve Schear wrote:
>>Digicash has software for Unix platforms which one could very easily
>>call from a Perl script.  Sure, it wouldn't be pretty, it wouldn't
>>be ideal, but it would work and should be easy to incorporate into
>>many of the remailers.  (I think.)
>
>True, but then the remailer's income would be available to LE, since
>payee anonymity isn't supported by DC.  Accountless operation is by
>far a better alternative for some business.

Agreed.  But this is a feature to be added later, not one to stop us
from using ecash now.

I would also note that LE is not the only group of people that might
be interested.  Aside from various spook agencies (which are not law
enforcement agencies), there are all sorts of other scary people in
the world who should be kept out of one's financial affairs.

Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBNC6H/5aWtjSmRH/5AQGnowf7B1zSIQjn7VEibh4TRqZGqSR16KFogAFw
xOKfkhFWiA1Uvwc0QgWaRzlZ0qCUxnCaxzLYLqwhNqwoLtPeuNlZ1qPO2NnQkYlr
vjKIb6JSbmqLbROUQg9OOgJG8LbKKKB7sL8S7hp8qT2g2eP84H2JIUfuZtyl4Yg8
dnDmIQo+yn87T81wF3e1H2uQwwmjPvpJQlKWPzHuhARtluoStRUhiXEBqsAxUawU
COYO9/oRbHok7ta1yOw9f40GXuUIo809S99ENflA396F76xYbSbd25cH9vmzUcoW
z1W9JxeFtaAF90aMxyartpKolkLvTc2fDJ//E/H8N7KAGrkqVrIXCQ==
=Qiuq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----