cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-09-10 - Re: Government shows its hand…good news!

Header Data

From: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
To: “James S. Tyre” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: d865243617330832f75009b193a680941a85596884f1916bc098688d9f768371
Message ID: <v03102801b03c8d63950f@[10.0.2.15]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970909194656.9741B-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-10 20:37:02 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 04:37:02 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 04:37:02 +0800
To: "James S. Tyre" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Government shows its hand...good news!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970909194656.9741B-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <v03102801b03c8d63950f@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 8:53 PM -0700 9/9/97, James S. Tyre wrote:
>Tim May is correct (as is Declan's clarification of his earlier note).
>If the amendment does become law, however, do not expect two things:
>
>1.  Do not expect that it will be fast-tracked to the Supreme Court, as
>was the case with CDA.  Instead, expect that it will start with the
>District Court, take years to get to and through the Court of Appeals,
>and then, if the U.S. Supreme Court decides to hear the matter at all
>(it would have no obligation to do so), much more time there.

Do, however, expect injunctive relief prior to any definitive ruling.

>
>2.  Do not expect that a case will involve a broad coalition of
>plaintiffs, as was the case with the CDA.  Expect that the courts will
>only entertain an action by a plaintiff with traditional standing:  one
>who goes through all of the bureaucratic hoops trying to get a license,
>and then is turned down.

Do expect one or more crypto-libertatians to publicize the shipment of
software in violation of the new rules in order to force a judicial
show-down.

--Steve

Thread