1997-09-29 - Re: Remailers and ecash

Header Data

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: ec322a9f1bc966d822f6754602ccfa74573c585dddb849cad9db3b5981072ce7
Message ID: <2321ced0989df8c5fb475134a708618d@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-29 22:00:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 06:00:22 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 06:00:22 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <2321ced0989df8c5fb475134a708618d@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Robert A. Costner wrote:
>The only thing I have heard you mention is latency, which is a
>feature programmed into the remailers.  If anything, people would pay
>to add latency, not to take latency away.

And another point: Nobody wants to add latency.  (There may be a few
applications, but they are rare.)

What people want is security and one way to get it (sometimes) is by
adding latency to their messages.

Ideally, you would send a message and it would arrive at its
destination in milliseconds with complete security.

Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBNC/2ppaWtjSmRH/5AQGFvwf9Gt0lk4arO8YxSJmShOLkl0tzlG9Xwel2
LODIapK7/LeiHZ8sFMDBSnFqWf9B6gdiTODRapW7EaUsQIn2B6yBYvP9voO31K31
gPqScyravExP8ctubqPzB0tRdmWM1fcUGFhH0aI4pZpFiCjt1g3R5x88PhJ4HV3Z
a8J+Yq9gzKKm0X3qD9i9VcnPLRjJbLAmta1Vk6j/xm3bHlUHJbgynAyciblPVyCk
pB6YdxHgwNT2e+i2RkRYEvBm3poiHEmaRh4hwHt14SgqT6mmC+VGjkA+j+52woyL
NauD48mnEclO+Y973C+uOHfo7FBRmL/JFKiMh087SFjKv78fSu9BPg==
=xzIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----








Thread