1997-09-14 - Re: unSAFE won’t pass?

Header Data

From: Vin McLellan <vin@shore.net>
To: Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
Message Hash: fc6aaa4a8d552ddd0b7342315e1235696970d64b9e8a9415fd9662d2a1cc63e5
Message ID: <v03007803b041dab5a0b9@[198.115.179.81]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970912170428.10375J-100000@cp.pathfinder.com >
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-14 17:27:18 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 01:27:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Vin McLellan <vin@shore.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 01:27:18 +0800
To: Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: unSAFE won't pass?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970912170428.10375J-100000@cp.pathfinder.com >
Message-ID: <v03007803b041dab5a0b9@[198.115.179.81]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Will Rodger <rodger@worldnet.att.net> declared:

>It may make for good copy, but I think it's just fantasy to think the
>administration or their opponents, for that matter, will get what
>they want this year. Let them swarm. Who cares.
>
>At earliest, August of 1998 before anything passes - and even that is
>highly optimistic.

Will:

	Could you please explain the logic, numbers, and procedural
limitations of congressional action that lead you to this conclusion?

	Why not now?

	Why not between now and August '98?

	Why the deadline/target-date of August '98?

	Suerte,
		_Vin

"Cryptography is like literacy in the Dark Ages. Infinitely potent, for
good and ill... yet basically an intellectual construct, an idea, which by
its nature will resist efforts to restrict it to bureaucrats and others who
deem only themselves worthy of such Privilege."
_ A thinking man's Creed for Crypto/ vbm.

 *     Vin McLellan + The Privacy Guild + <vin@shore.net>    *
  53 Nichols St., Chelsea, MA 02150 USA <617> 884-5548







Thread