1997-10-25 - Re: Office of the Secretary of Defense vs the First Amendment

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 011841cf9e24534bac6c5e90395971e09d84b209c2bb5452c4492d01a97c39a2
Message ID: <199710251720.TAA25167@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971024204540.26025u-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-25 17:30:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 01:30:27 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 01:30:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Office of the Secretary of Defense vs the First Amendment
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.971024204540.26025u-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <199710251720.TAA25167@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Someone is vastly over-reacting.  I read this letter as a polite request
to do what they think is the "right thing" along with some reasons
intended to gently persuade you that this is a morally correct choice. 

There is no threat.  No hint of compulsion.  It is IMHO utterly legal and
appropriate.

Just as it would be utterly legal to comply with or ignore this
letter. (Appropriateness we could debate...)

No foul.



A. Michael Froomkin          +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law   remailed to foil spam
U. Miami School of Law       froomkin =A=T= law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087              http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA   It's quite warm here






Thread