1997-10-23 - Re: What RSA & Netscape have to offer

Header Data

From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 41b79401d4ba22da52f79cc02809f041c58e65564c191f9ff00209decaf19605
Message ID: <v03102801b07530cf5a1e@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <199710230817.EAA21914@users.invweb.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-23 17:01:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:01:42 +0800

Raw message

From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 01:01:42 +0800
To: "William H. Geiger III" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: What RSA & Netscape have to offer
In-Reply-To: <199710230817.EAA21914@users.invweb.net>
Message-ID: <v03102801b07530cf5a1e@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 1:19 AM -0700 10/23/97, William H. Geiger III wrote:

>While the list is busy knocking PGP for not doing the "right thing" or
>being the "first ones to blink" I though I would share with the list what
>some of the "big boys" are doing for the spread of "Strong Crypto to the
>Masses". Below is from the most current S/MIME draft
>"draft-dusse-smime-msg-05" dated 19-Oct-1997:
...
>I think that when taking pot-shots at PGP, Inc. and Phil Zimmerman one
>should look at what the alternatives are and who are really are friends
>here. IMNSHO companies like RSA, Netscape, Microsoft, Verisign, et al, who
>would sell us all out if it improved their bottom lines do not qualify.

The consistent theme of the Cyphepunks contributors, modulo the noise and
insults and general fun over the past 5 years, has been to call a spade a
spade.

That is, regardless of what the alternatives may be, we call them as we see
them.

Weaknesses are weaknesses. Science dictates what we say.

"But Bad Option B is even worse than Bad Option A, so we should support Bad
Option A" is not very compelling to most of us.

That other companies may also be preparting GAK or GMR or deliberately
weakened ciphers is hardly news. Big Brother is leaning on companies in
many ways, ranging from threats of lawsuits, to antitrust actions, to
denial of export permits, to dangling lucrative contracts.

And the alternatives, for us as users, are not necessarily PGP for Business
5.5 vs. Netscape for Security Departments vs. Internet Explorer for
Fascists. No, the alternatives are to continue using ciphers with strong
cores and long keys.

--Tim May

The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221   | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."








Thread