1997-10-14 - Re: commercial data recovery

Header Data

From: alexlh@xs4all.nl
To: Zooko Journeyman <zooko@xs4all.nl>
Message Hash: 5c1690dd8fbaea7ffac3a37620786d57fa085fd82d51db30b1813d843b2de630
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.971014140714.7399A-100000@xs1.xs4all.nl>
Reply To: <199710141053.MAA03610@xs1.xs4all.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-14 12:21:43 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 20:21:43 +0800

Raw message

From: alexlh@xs4all.nl
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 20:21:43 +0800
To: Zooko Journeyman <zooko@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: commercial data recovery
In-Reply-To: <199710141053.MAA03610@xs1.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.971014140714.7399A-100000@xs1.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Tue, 14 Oct 1997, Zooko Journeyman wrote:

> Zooko's Backup Server can be physically located in a country 
> free of such intrusive organizations, but of course it is the
> intrusive organizations of the _client's_ country that become
> important with that kind of protocol...

How about also having Alex' Backup Server, and using some
shared-secret/whatever tech to ensure that you need to contents of _both_
servers to actually reconstruct the data. This would be a 'Distributed
Encrypted Backup Sysyem'.

This might make it very hard for anyone to access your data without your
knowledge/cooperation.

And if you use something like Onion Routers, it might even be quite
impossible for some lawenforcement agency to actually find out which one
of those encrypted files on the servers contains your backup.

Alex

---
I dabble in techno-house and sometimes,
I do that badass hip-hop thang...
But the F U N K gets me every time!






Thread