1997-10-05 - Re: Stronghold

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5f246b937bb16046c1efbf9cf254186764c154eb8ce4bf2efb8feec35f912d58
Message ID: <gPc5De2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971005124514.03d6c91c@ctrl-alt-del.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-05 23:26:07 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:26:07 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:26:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stronghold
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971005124514.03d6c91c@ctrl-alt-del.com>
Message-ID: <gPc5De2w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Alan <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com> writes:
> Everytime someone asks for said proof, there is a huge amount of handwaving
> and misdirection as to why any sort of proof cannot be revealed.  Each time
> the excuses get more and more elaborate.  "C2Net will sue us." "We can make
> more money if we keep it secret." "It is already well known."

Alan, are you still doubting that C2Net's lawyers threatened several people
on this mailing list and demanded that they not publish the "proof"?

They called my home a number of times and served me with some papers.

I'm surprised that JYA hasn't placed the C2Net lawyer letter in his archives.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread