1997-10-06 - Re: Trademarking CypherSpace???

Header Data

From: Eric Hughes <eric@sac.net>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: 85bb1becbfd64779b568bb470d2eddd894e94abffc6326e94d941f34d0d0244c
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971006132514.033f9a78@mail.sac.net>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971005185236.00688c68@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-06 20:53:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 04:53:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Eric Hughes <eric@sac.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 04:53:57 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Trademarking CypherSpace???
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971005185236.00688c68@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971006132514.033f9a78@mail.sac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 06:52 PM 10/5/97 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
>Sigh.  A company called I-Planet is trying to trademark the term 
>"Cypherspace", even though we've been using it for a couple of years
>in the cypherpunk community.  

All this fuss is really not such a big deal, as long as the Patent and
Trademark Office <http://www.uspto.gov> hears about it.  I know nothing
about trademark procedure, but I imagine that a letter (or three) to the
PTO referencing the right application number on it could scotch an
application but quick.  Printing out email and adding a stamp seems almost
sufficient.

Maybe the nice folks at i-planet (I know you're getting this) could just
post their application number and save us the trouble of finding it ourselves?

And I checked:  The fee for a formal _ex parte_ appeal filing is only $100.
 I'm sure the i-planet lawyers will spend far more than that defending one
of those.

Eric






Thread