1997-10-01 - Re: Remailers and ecash

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: afa5bdf6f73713acad701ab98754d9cb89c0c69c9590937be366802543493b14
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971001175133.1435A-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
Reply To: <46ee864da2b5a3279142ba5c3ce1deea@anon.efga.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-01 16:17:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 00:17:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 00:17:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
In-Reply-To: <46ee864da2b5a3279142ba5c3ce1deea@anon.efga.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971001175133.1435A-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 1 Oct 1997, Anonymous wrote:

> 
> Using a remailer doesn't hide the fact that the sender is using a
> remailer.  An eavesdropper who monitors incoming messages to the
> remailers can easily learn who is using them.  A constant bandwidth
> connection will at least disguise *when* the messages are sent.

Using a constant bandwidth connection just to the remailer network is a
waste. Better set up such a connection to a Pipe-net or Onion Router
network. The you can use the pipe for other services then mail. A welcome
side benefit would be that this conceals the use of "mail" remailers

-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred.
   "Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"






Thread