1997-10-02 - Re: CDA protects against liability

Header Data

From: Georgia Cracker Remailer Administrator <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: bd076f68b4891332bca7ebca019b1a34f1550562bdc5ad9b167c2ff2a90acccd
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971002164612.20891A-100000@server1.efga.org>
Reply To: <v03007800b059a71da182@[168.161.105.141]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-02 21:07:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 05:07:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Georgia Cracker Remailer Administrator <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 05:07:24 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: CDA protects against liability
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b059a71da182@[168.161.105.141]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971002164612.20891A-100000@server1.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:

> At 13:46 -0400 10/2/97, Anonymous wrote:
> >Another case where the CDA protected against liability.  Remailer ops
> >should look into this.
> >
> >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/7361.html:

This remailer-op, while not previously aware of the case, is well-aware of
that provision of the CDA, but has not yet had the need or opportunity to
use it as a legal defense. The reference is Public Law 104-104, Title V,
Subtitle A, Sec. 502 as it amends (47 U.S.C. 223). The text of this law is
available on-line at:

        http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:S.652.ENR:

My interpretation of this is: Anonymous remailers are internet service
providers.

--
For information on this anonymous remailing system, send the subject
"remailer-help" to <remailer@anon.efga.org> or visit our web pages at
http://anon.efga.org/anon/. To contact the operator directly, send mail
to <admin@anon.efga.org>. For general information and discussion about
anonymous remailers, send a message with "subscribe" in the body to
<remailer-politics-request@server1.efga.org>.






Thread