1997-10-21 - Re: SMTP Encryption Extension

Header Data

From: mskala@meares.csc.UVic.CA
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cd400ac27c8e47a6ddd44cef414ac8fa15b60f9fc64fb19a9b3a548655ffe745
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971021004608.17560B-100000@meares>
Reply To: <CMM.0.90.4.877388285.ariel@stealth.cc.columbia.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-21 07:55:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:55:37 +0800

Raw message

From: mskala@meares.csc.UVic.CA
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:55:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SMTP Encryption Extension
In-Reply-To: <CMM.0.90.4.877388285.ariel@stealth.cc.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971021004608.17560B-100000@meares>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Ariel Glenn wrote:
> >Well, what are we really concerned about?  Not Web traffic - although your
> 
> Not at all! Most of my time is spent trying to keep 'restricted data'
> from being scooped by the wrong people... from the Web. We have

Well, whatever.  *I'm* more concerned about email.  Of course the same 
argument could be used to support encrypted HTTP, but there's already 
plenty of work being done on that and the main problems seem to be 
political rather than technical.






Thread