1997-10-02 - Re: Remailers and ecash

Header Data

From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: d95849f11971d1329b75901dc3443ee0832d1151bbe8b5727583b242c6a3af73
Message ID: <199710012356.TAA03115@mx02.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-02 00:23:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:23:31 +0800

Raw message

From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:23:31 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <199710012356.TAA03115@mx02.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/1/97 5:03 AM, Robert A. Costner (pooh@efga.org)  passed this
wisdom:

>At 09:59 AM 10/1/97 +0200, Anonymous (Monty Cantsin) wrote:
>>It is my understanding that serious naval vessels like aircraft
>>carriers use constant bandwidth channels to defeat traffic analysis.
>>That is, to every place they might wish to communicate, they
>>continuously broadcast encrypted information.  Most of the time the
>>channel is empty, of course, but nobody outside can tell when.
>>
>>If we had a remailer network in which each customer had a constant
>>bandwidth connection to one or more remailers, you could have zero
>>latency mail.
>
>Let me get this straight.  You are suggesting that anyone who wishes
to be
>anonymous should send a continuous 24 hour stream of low bandwidth
data to
>a central point in an effort to help keep anyone from knowing that
they
>wish to be anonymous.  
>
>While this may help correct the latency problem, how do you think
this will
>effect anonymity?  Do you think that by sending a continuos stream of
data
>to the remailer, the sender will be less identifiable?

 No, but I see that someone with a fulltime connection or even a
fulltime machine with an hourly or half hourly dialup would setup a
program to send randomly generated "Null:" messages to the randomly
selected remailers so that when he does have something to send that is
meaningful it will not change the apparent flow ...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNDLjFMdZgC62U/gIEQI1wgCg22mCFVbWn77DwG1CUlIRJah7oooAnic0
e0J0D1IOLP85CNvadBh9cBVA
=5UGm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr
  For PGP Keys  <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key>

   "First say to your self what you would be; then do what you
    have to do."  Epictetus (35-135 A.D.)







Thread