1997-11-17 - Re: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be
Header Data
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: “wabe” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 03110d15ac57bb75280cd5325254c0d59258feaba87bc6d659fdf9d733deeb40
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19971116130115.007134ec@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <01bcf27e$a115e8e0$737f61ce@dave>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-17 00:12:58 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:12:58 +0800
Raw message
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:12:58 +0800
To: "wabe" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be
In-Reply-To: <01bcf27e$a115e8e0$737f61ce@dave>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19971116130115.007134ec@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:58 AM 11/16/1997 -0800, wabe wrote:
>ANONYMOUS said:
>> evolve or die
>
>Evolution requires death, by definition.
No - it requires different reproduction rates.
If the old population hangs around without dying,
or reproduction works by splitting, that's fine.
Seems to have happened to the list....
Thanks!
Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
Thread
Return to November 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
Return to ““wabe” <wabe@smart.net>”
- 1997-11-16 (Mon, 17 Nov 1997 03:13:14 +0800) - evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be - “wabe” <wabe@smart.net>
- 1997-11-17 (Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:12:58 +0800) - Re: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>