From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)"Bob O'Booey" <a-hole@dev.null>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:39:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: [cpe:4545] Mission:Critical and Informal Fallacies
Message-ID: <199711180328.EAA15488@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



TruthMonger wrote:
>Robert Hettinga wrote:
>>  Notice
>> that argumentum ad hominem is when you discount someone's opinion because
>> of who they are or what they do. Vuperative insults, it seems, are another
>> thing altogether.  :-).
>
>  Right... Like we're going to believe this when communist pedophile 
>Nazi cocksucker Robert Hettinga tells it to us.

Careful, TM, you're starting to sound like a member of the Usenet Kook Cabal.

>  I bet that when I look up 'vuperative' in the dictionary, he'll be
>wrong about that, too.

I was stuck on 'vituperative.' Shows what I know. But 'attack the messenger,
not the message' is old news here.

>AdHomineMonger

Kiss my ass. :-)