From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3d0c006518923275bdd8aff469385b08c7ac55705183bcf8aef361edc38515ac
Message ID: <199711141219.NAA14497@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-14 12:33:26 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 20:33:26 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 20:33:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Key Signing
Message-ID: <199711141219.NAA14497@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill Stewart wrote:
> I'm not sure how comfortable I am signing a key which has the
> private keys made public - so I signed it, and revoked it,
> and you're welcome to the signed revocation certificate :-)
>
> The keyserver says it accepted the certificate, but doesn't
> find it when I query it for the key, but then it did that to me
> earlier today, so I'm not sure if it's there or not.
> (It's the server at http://www.pgp.com/keyserver/pks-lookup.cgi .)
>
> The KeyID was 0x61C747B1 - 512-bit RSA
The PGP Keyserver could not find the key when accessed from the
PGP web site (Find a Public Key), but when requesting it from
inside PGP 5.0, it retrieved the key, revoking the key on my
secret key ring, in the process.
Necessarily Knott, ME
(Although it _may_ be me, since I have not signed the message...
Or is it the other way around? This is getting confusing.)
Return to November 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1997-11-14 (Fri, 14 Nov 1997 20:33:26 +0800) - Re: Key Signing - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)