From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 12:49:42 +0800
To: 6ualdv8@sk.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Russ Alberry/CAUCE vs. the Cypherpunks (was: Re: RESULT: comp.org.cauc
In-Reply-To: <3478A08B.72DE@dev.null>
Message-ID: <199711240434.WAA03995@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



I do not think that your message made it to USENET, TruthMonger.

igor

TruthMonger wrote:
> 
> 
> lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
> > 
> > Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > * I am specifically pissed at Igor about trolling for votes on                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >  random newsgroups and on Cypherpunks.
> 
> > In what sense are you using the word "trolling"?  Are you saying that the
> > mention of a proposal to ban anonymity is considered "trolling" when posted
> > amongst a group of pro-privacy, pro-anonymity individuals such as the
> > Cypherpunks? 
> 
>   Sounds like he is only objecting to you discussing issues important
> to you with groups you belong to and groups that you *don't* belong to.
>   Sounds like Chelsea is pushing daddy's fascist agenda at Stanford.
> 
> > Why is publicly disagreeing with you considered a "propaganda campaign"?
> > Why should the C.A.U.C.E. brand of propaganda be the only variety allowed?
> 
>   Because fickless ducks live in fear of individuals who threaten
> their ability to hide under phantom security blankets.
>   
> > When I first heard of the C.A.U.C.E., my initial thought was that it was a
> > good idea.  Finally a means to fight back against the spammers.  Now I'm
> > starting  to wonder what sort of agenda is driving some of these illogical
> > anti-privacy requirements.
> 
>   Often, it is just the result of people who come up with some inane
> brainstorm that looks good on the surface, but are too intellectually
> lazy to think it through and resent anyone who does so (thus destroying
> their petty work of self-proclaimed 'genius'.
>   The real losers end up doing a lot of campaigning to make up for the
> insufficiency of their logic, under the delusion that getting as many
> others as possible to jump on their bandwagon will somehow increase
> their low level of self-esteem.
> 
>   Sounds to me like the dweeb is pissed because he had to do a lot
> of blather-spamming to overcome the effects of Igor's rational
> and balanced posts on the subject.
>   Perhaps his next project could be to promote a vote on a new
> value for 'pi'. 
> 
> TruthMonger
> 



	- Igor.