1997-11-12 - Re: CDA: The Sequel – introduced in the U.S. Senate

Header Data

From: Lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 754c58090857ff918d4d23d7486c14f7021acaecfd03da9851257795915c5020
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19971112150957.00e3fb40@dnai.com>
Reply To: <Declan McCullagh’s message of “Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:01:57 -0500”>
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-12 23:19:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 07:19:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Lizard <lizard@mrlizard.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 07:19:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CDA: The Sequel -- introduced in the U.S. Senate
In-Reply-To: <Declan McCullagh's message of "Wed, 12 Nov 1997 17:01:57 -0500">
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19971112150957.00e3fb40@dnai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 06:05 PM 11/12/97 -0500, Colin Rafferty wrote:
>
>By the way, my signature contains an ascii art rendition of an adult
>about to have sex with a child.  I believe that (i) it appeals to a
>prurient interest in sex; (ii) it depicts, in a patently offensive way,
>a simulated sexual act; and (iii) lacks any value whatsoever.
>
>Now all I need to do is put it up on a web page on a for-profit company.
>
More to the point, since Deja News will bring it up if you post to Usenet
with it, they become 'porn distributors'.






Thread